53
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Suppose we'd like to find <math>\nabla_{x_1}\log(f(x_1, x_2, x_3, ...))</math>. By the chain rule this is equal to <math>\frac{\nabla_{x_1}f(x_1, x_2, x_3 ...)}{f(x_1, x_2, x_3 ...)}</math>. Thus, by rearranging, we can take the gradient of any function with respect to some variable as <math>\nabla_{x_1}f(x_1, x_2, x_3, ...)= f(x_1, x_2, x_3,...)\nabla_{x_1}\log(f(x_1, x_2, x_3, ...)</math>.
Thus, using this idea, we can rewrite our gradient as <math> \sum_\tau R(\tau) p(\tau | \theta) \nabla_\theta \log P(\tau | \theta) </math>. Finally, using the definition of expectation again, we have <math> \nabla_\theta J(\theta) = E_{\tau \sim \pi_\theta} \left[\sum_{t=0}^T \nabla_\theta \log \pi_\theta (a_t | s_t) \right] </math>
=== Loss Computation ===
